<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m choosing YouTube over Seesmic for instant video publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/</link>
	<description>Better business through collaboration and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:23:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I *think* TubeMogul lets you upload a video to a central location before&lt;br&gt;they redsitribute it for you.  If I am right then that would allow you to&lt;br&gt;distribute widely without any additional local bandwidth cost.  I&#039;ll have to&lt;br&gt;test it later to see if this is accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *think* TubeMogul lets you upload a video to a central location before<br />they redsitribute it for you.  If I am right then that would allow you to<br />distribute widely without any additional local bandwidth cost.  I&#39;ll have to<br />test it later to see if this is accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Our bandwidth constraints make posting to multiple sites pretty costly so I tend to post to one location and let services like FriendFeed or Twitter spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our bandwidth constraints make posting to multiple sites pretty costly so I tend to post to one location and let services like FriendFeed or Twitter spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-292</guid>
		<description>I like the suggestion to use multiple services, and I agree with you that YouTube is a bit impersonal.  Have you tried TubeMogul or anything like it for posting videos to multiple sites?  I&#039;m trying to decide if I have a use for that.  My feeling right now is that I really like Seesmic-style instant publishing and I am not ready to get into video editing, so I probably don&#039;t need multiple destinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the suggestion to use multiple services, and I agree with you that YouTube is a bit impersonal.  Have you tried TubeMogul or anything like it for posting videos to multiple sites?  I&#39;m trying to decide if I have a use for that.  My feeling right now is that I really like Seesmic-style instant publishing and I am not ready to get into video editing, so I probably don&#39;t need multiple destinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauljacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>pauljacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-291</guid>
		<description>I have only just seen this thread so it may be old news already.  I was initially sceptical of Seesmic and found that the more I use it the more I enjoy it.  My only real regret is that I have limited bandwidth which prevents me from engaging in it more fully.  Of course Loïc&#039;s personal approach to feedback just inspires me even more to use the service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said I use other video hosting services for other videos which I produce for work or to share with family.  I don&#039;t use YouTube, largely because I feel that there are other options out there that feel better to me.  I know it sounds a bit odd but YouTube just feels too busy and too impersonal with the volume of content up there so I use Vimeo for personal videos and a local video service called &lt;a href=&quot;http://Zoopy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zoopy.com&lt;/a&gt; for my business videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only just seen this thread so it may be old news already.  I was initially sceptical of Seesmic and found that the more I use it the more I enjoy it.  My only real regret is that I have limited bandwidth which prevents me from engaging in it more fully.  Of course Loïc&#39;s personal approach to feedback just inspires me even more to use the service.</p>
<p>That being said I use other video hosting services for other videos which I produce for work or to share with family.  I don&#39;t use YouTube, largely because I feel that there are other options out there that feel better to me.  I know it sounds a bit odd but YouTube just feels too busy and too impersonal with the volume of content up there so I use Vimeo for personal videos and a local video service called <a href="http://Zoopy.com" rel="nofollow">Zoopy.com</a> for my business videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to share your positive experiences with Seesmic, Sean.  I must admit I&#039;m a neophyte in the video publishing arena.  My recent posts on the topic have simply chronicled my experiences trying out a few different services and trying to use them for my purposes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think where my use case differs from yours is that I&#039;m initially approaching Seesmic as a selfish end user:  What is this &quot;Seesmic&quot; thing and what can it do for me&quot;?  You&#039;ve clearly gone a step above and started exploring the ways that you can contribute to the the burgeoning Seesmic community.  Assuming I find reasons to keep using the service I&#039;ll probably get there myself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Loic&#039;s quick response to my lukewarm review of his product is certainly admirable and I agree that it&#039;s not the sort of behavior I&#039;d expect to see from Google.  In fact Loic&#039;s personalized approach to customer service reminds me strongly of the style of Jason Goldberg, the CEO of SocialMedian.  Jason spent much of last year personally promoting his service and keeping up with individual users.  How did that work out for Jason?  He recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://louisgray.com/live/2008/12/from-zero-to-xing-socialmedians-path.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sold his company to Xing for a few million dollars&lt;/a&gt;.  Clearly Loic&#039;s in good company and I hope he can keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to share your positive experiences with Seesmic, Sean.  I must admit I&#39;m a neophyte in the video publishing arena.  My recent posts on the topic have simply chronicled my experiences trying out a few different services and trying to use them for my purposes.</p>
<p>I think where my use case differs from yours is that I&#39;m initially approaching Seesmic as a selfish end user:  What is this &#8220;Seesmic&#8221; thing and what can it do for me&#8221;?  You&#39;ve clearly gone a step above and started exploring the ways that you can contribute to the the burgeoning Seesmic community.  Assuming I find reasons to keep using the service I&#39;ll probably get there myself.</p>
<p>Loic&#39;s quick response to my lukewarm review of his product is certainly admirable and I agree that it&#39;s not the sort of behavior I&#39;d expect to see from Google.  In fact Loic&#39;s personalized approach to customer service reminds me strongly of the style of Jason Goldberg, the CEO of SocialMedian.  Jason spent much of last year personally promoting his service and keeping up with individual users.  How did that work out for Jason?  He recently <a href="http://louisgray.com/live/2008/12/from-zero-to-xing-socialmedians-path.html" rel="nofollow">sold his company to Xing for a few million dollars</a>.  Clearly Loic&#39;s in good company and I hope he can keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Mona, you&#039;ve cut right to the business case for using YouTube - it&#039;s got a bigger following and will doubtless bring more traffic.  All the same I can&#039;t help but feel a bit of an obligation to try out the other entrants into the market and do my best to publicize their successes.  Choices like this remind me of Hutch Carpenter&#039;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://bhc3.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/angels-and-demons-of-our-social-media-souls/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Angels and Demons of Our Social Media Souls&lt;/a&gt; chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mona, you&#39;ve cut right to the business case for using YouTube &#8211; it&#39;s got a bigger following and will doubtless bring more traffic.  All the same I can&#39;t help but feel a bit of an obligation to try out the other entrants into the market and do my best to publicize their successes.  Choices like this remind me of Hutch Carpenter&#39;s recent <a href="http://bhc3.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/angels-and-demons-of-our-social-media-souls/" rel="nofollow">Angels and Demons of Our Social Media Souls</a> chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean808080</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>sean808080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on what is important to you regarding video publishing.  I wouldn&#039;t think google reader embedding and having the largest number of eyes are important at all to the typical seesmic user since seesmic is really all about the conversation and the quality of the dialogue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love youtube and the sheer number of videos some of which are funny as all hell.  Have you seen Charlotte takes a tumble? That shit still makes me laugh deep belly laughs.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s just that for some of us, the criteria that drive us to continue using seesmic are the _responsiveness_ of the team there as shown by Loic&#039;s response to your blog post.  Loic and his team are everywhere and always listening to feedback to improve their product.  Can we say the same about youtube or any google product for that matter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, I was so impressed by the speed and quality of seesmics response to a kerfuffle that happened a few months back, that I blogged about it here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sean808080.com/blog/seesmic-raising-the-bar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sean808080.com/blog/seesmic-raising-the-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For my purposes and many others, this responsiveness and also having the ability to create private video conversations for our teams is really a driver and the noises I hear is that seesmic will enable this shortly.  If/when that happens, I think you&#039;ll see a whole lot more meaningful talk between teams and families taking place on seesmic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sharing your take.  Different strokes for different folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on what is important to you regarding video publishing.  I wouldn&#39;t think google reader embedding and having the largest number of eyes are important at all to the typical seesmic user since seesmic is really all about the conversation and the quality of the dialogue.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t get me wrong, I love youtube and the sheer number of videos some of which are funny as all hell.  Have you seen Charlotte takes a tumble? That shit still makes me laugh deep belly laughs.  </p>
<p>It&#39;s just that for some of us, the criteria that drive us to continue using seesmic are the _responsiveness_ of the team there as shown by Loic&#39;s response to your blog post.  Loic and his team are everywhere and always listening to feedback to improve their product.  Can we say the same about youtube or any google product for that matter?</p>
<p>In fact, I was so impressed by the speed and quality of seesmics response to a kerfuffle that happened a few months back, that I blogged about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://sean808080.com/blog/seesmic-raising-the-bar/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://sean808080.com/blog/seesmic-raising-the-.." rel="nofollow">http://sean808080.com/blog/seesmic-raising-the-..</a>.</p>
<p>For my purposes and many others, this responsiveness and also having the ability to create private video conversations for our teams is really a driver and the noises I hear is that seesmic will enable this shortly.  If/when that happens, I think you&#39;ll see a whole lot more meaningful talk between teams and families taking place on seesmic.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your take.  Different strokes for different folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona N.</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Daniel - Google. Juice. I would go with YouTube since I presume you would want an audience base outside of the Soc Net realm. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel &#8211; Google. Juice. I would go with YouTube since I presume you would want an audience base outside of the Soc Net realm. <img src='http://www.sharingatwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Pritchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Loic, it&#039;s very impressive to see that your team is on top of these issues.  The fact that Seesmic embeds so easily into DISQUS and FriendFeed is a great selling point already and I think if the stats and Reader issues go away I probably will go back to using Seesmic as my primary instant video publishing tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for taking the time to explain your plans here!  It certainly won&#039;t take much to convince me to give you and other smaller players in the video market a fair shake.  As much as I appreciate what YouTube&#039;s done for us I think we can all agree that a competitive market benefits the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loic, it&#39;s very impressive to see that your team is on top of these issues.  The fact that Seesmic embeds so easily into DISQUS and FriendFeed is a great selling point already and I think if the stats and Reader issues go away I probably will go back to using Seesmic as my primary instant video publishing tool.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to explain your plans here!  It certainly won&#39;t take much to convince me to give you and other smaller players in the video market a fair shake.  As much as I appreciate what YouTube&#39;s done for us I think we can all agree that a competitive market benefits the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loicdirect@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2009/01/why-im-choosing-youtube-over-seesmic-for-instant-video-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>loicdirect@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharingatwork.com/?p=377#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Hello Daniel, I am the founder of Seesmic and would like to thank you for your feedback, even negative, as it shows how interested you are in what we do. You are totally right, we need stats and we need google reader whitelisting. Both are coming in the next weeks and I hope it will help you get back to seesmic for casual video. Now one thing you probably did not notice on YouTube is that recording or uploading a video regardless of with or withour a webcam takes about 20 minutes to process while we publish them in a matter of seconds. That is one of the reasons I bothered launching Seesmic at all. Seesmic aims at being to YouTube what Twitter is to blogging. Casual, fast, cool. We aim at giving you the best of both worlds as we started integrating Seesmic with YouTube. Right now you can publish YT videos on Seesmic and we are building posting Seesmic videos to your YouTube channel. Hope to see you back when (or before) we have what you miss. Thank you again in any case. Loic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Daniel, I am the founder of Seesmic and would like to thank you for your feedback, even negative, as it shows how interested you are in what we do. You are totally right, we need stats and we need google reader whitelisting. Both are coming in the next weeks and I hope it will help you get back to seesmic for casual video. Now one thing you probably did not notice on YouTube is that recording or uploading a video regardless of with or withour a webcam takes about 20 minutes to process while we publish them in a matter of seconds. That is one of the reasons I bothered launching Seesmic at all. Seesmic aims at being to YouTube what Twitter is to blogging. Casual, fast, cool. We aim at giving you the best of both worlds as we started integrating Seesmic with YouTube. Right now you can publish YT videos on Seesmic and we are building posting Seesmic videos to your YouTube channel. Hope to see you back when (or before) we have what you miss. Thank you again in any case. Loic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

